Author |
Comment
|
Onnie
Frequently Perched
(9/17/01 10:02:30 am)
|
Re:
An Afghani-American perspective
Quote:
Just as an example of our own unawareness: nobody seems to remember
our stance in Chechnya, where we basically sat on our hands while
Muslim civilians were being slaughtered. I'm not trying to take
a side in that particular issue, but it's those kinds of foreign
circumstances that have painted a pretty bad picture of us to
our enemies - and we should be aware of that.
Unfortunately, it is rather hard to pick and choose who to help
and where to step in and when. I wouldn't want the job.
When we do step in we are "policing the world" and condemed
for it. When we don't step in "We should have done something
how dare we sit on the sidelines." Sometimes it is the entire
UN's decision but the US takes the major lick for the action or
non-action.
Really the world needs to come together under the UN so it is truly
a world effort focusing on regions that need help. Of course we
all know that's not going to happen very soon but hey it is nice
to dream right?
|
AZLady
Frequently Perched
(9/17/01 10:26:49 am)
|
Lady Diedre
I've been think back on your statement that the rest of the world
laughs at us for thinking we are "the best." In normal
times, I truly don't. Please keep in mind, however, that NOTHING
like this has happened on American soil in nearly two hundred years.
Obviously it has in most of the rest of the world, I am very familiar
with the history of WWII. But I don't believe anything like has
happened in the lifetimes of most of us anywhere in the world, in
peacetime, that killed so many thousands of civilians.
Personally, if I don't keep thinking NOW that we are the best, we
are the strongest, we will get through this, I don't believe I could
bear it.
|
Tricia
Perch Pro
(9/17/01 10:59:12 am)
|
Innocent Civilians
Approximately 200,000 people, the vast majority innocent civilians,
died after the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima.
About 50,000 were killed with another atomic bomb in Nagasaki a
few days later.
On the night of February 14, 1945 it is estimated that 25,000 to
30,000 German civilians were killed in one Allied bombing raid,
using something called "incendiaries", which created a
firestorm.
In Britain, during the bombing raids that took place from September
1940 to May 1941, known as "The Blitz", 18,000 tons of
high explosives were dropped on England. About 35,000 civilians
were killed.
|
Kira
Scurro
Perch Pro
(9/17/01 11:09:39 am)
|
Re: Innocent
Civilians
i'm feeling a lot better about the direction of this thread now.
az seems to feel i'm against america (my interpretation...so that
could be the wrong word...but i see where you're coming from, az)
i'm no less patriotic than anyone else out there. i just react strongly
to feelings of america being the greatest country on earth. we're
pretty damned good, but we can be pretty damned bad, too. if we
forget that we're allowing the rhetoric to mow us down.
Quote:
Both the extreme right and extreme left need to move to the center
with the rest of us.
i'm sorry, i can't do this just because of
what's happened. not if it means i must follow an agenda that i
implicitly disapprove of. solidarity means nothing if you believe
you're following the wrong path.
i'm also starting to feel a little better about the administration's
plans. as long as i'm listening to powell and not bush, i can rest
a little easier. this is still a free country so i can call the
president whatever i like. i can't profess to being the most tactful
when i'm strongly aroused.
why was it necessary to cry out "war!"? there have been
terrorist attacks all over the world before this without the victimized
country declaring war. no one actually knows that "going to
war" doesn't necessarily mean what we have known war to be.
the same purpose would have been served if we had just been told
that we were mobilizing troops to find the terrorists cells...all
over the world. the same sanctions would have been granted by our
government. it could have all been handled a lot less sensationally.
wasn't the actual event terrifying enough without the additional
bulldog approach? this is why i dislike our president's presentation
of this crisis.
but others would disagree, because we have always been a country
who had to look the best, retaliate the fastest, and be offended
the quickest. with the surveys mounting of how many americans are
ready to go to war, our global position evidently exactly reflects
our citizens' feelings. my personal opinion is this is as wrong
a way for individuals to react to those around them as it is for
our country to react to the rest of the world. i hate to see this
attitude in our leaders.
onnie, i think we're on the same track, so i won't respond in depth
to all of your points. i appreciate your response to mine, though.
i think most of the points i made have already been examined and
explained perfectly by others. thanks, guys.
~BELIEVE~
|
AZLady
Frequently Perched
(9/17/01 11:38:04 am)
|
Tricia and
Kira
Tricia, note that I said, "in peacetime." I am more than
aware of how many thousands of civilians died in Europe and Japan.
Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm sure someone will!, but until Tuesday
the US didn't think it was at war with anyone. I'm not sure what
to call what we are in now, but it hasn't been peacetime since Tuesday.
Kira, I know I've been way too emotional about this. I do realize
that there are many ways of looking at all the whys, wherefores,
etc. of this disaster. But for the immediate future I stand by my
statement that we must stand united and not let arguments over what
we should or should have not done in WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Bosnia,
Somalia.....Lord, there are way too many of these....cause us to
become, and appear to the rest of the world to become, divided in
this cause.
I truly hope when this is over....assuming, of course, that any
of us are still around when this is over...we can go back to being
liberals, conservatives, or whatever and still have the right to
every different opinon our very diverse population can come up with....without,
of course, attempting to impose those opinions by force.
Peace to both of you.
|
AZLady
Frequently Perched
(9/17/01 12:24:26 pm)
|
I keep thinking
of things I wish I'd said
Kira, I'm praying, as I'm sure you are, that our nation's leaders
take us in a direction most of us will be willing to follow, with
a few reservations, perhaps, but follow none the less. I'm also
praying that somewhere down the line what seems to be the right
direction now, doesn't land us in even worse trouble later. Too
bad we can't live life in reverse, isn't it?
Bush's rhetoric, I agree, is somewhat over the top, probably because
he feels this is what the nation needs to hear. But his statements,
as well as those of others I have read, that we will only act once
we are sure we are right, have been very encouraging to me. The
fact that he is working with leaders from around the world toward
this common goal, rather than riding off with both guns (or missiles)
blazing, is also encouraging as is the Attorney General's strong
condemnation of hate attacks against Arabs living in this country....not
that those a**holes responsible for the attacks are going to listen
to him or anyone else.
I don't think you are unAmerican....just perhaps slightly misguided,
in my humble opinion (joking here!) I also am feeling better about
the direction this thread is taking.
Again, peace
|
Onnie
Frequently Perched
(9/17/01 12:26:14 pm)
|
Re: An Afghani-American perspective
I understand everyone is emtional. Rightly so and I hope my replies
have tried to sound clear headed. (Even if I am not honestly feeling
clear headed when doing something else that doesn't involve a reply.)
I have been reading back over the thread and noticed (or perhaps
it was another one) the mention that perhaps we should send a ton
of food into the country to gain support. I have a couple of questions;
1) Support for .... That the people over throw the goverment or
force them to hand over bin Laden?
These people are unarmed. Wait this says it better about their lives:
Quote:
Why are thousands of people fleeing Afghanistan in search of havens
like Australia? What could have driven the escape of the Afghanis
rescued by the Tampa?
Four Corners takes viewers on a shocking journey into Afghanistan
to reveal the horror of life under Taliban rule.
In this powerful film from Britain's Channel 4, reporter Saira
Shah goes in search of her father's birthplace to find a nation
devastated by war, drought and one of the most repressive regimes
on the planet.
Shah leaves behind a sea of Afghani refugees on the Pakistan side
of the border to begin a cat and mouse game with agents from the
Taliban's Ministry for the Prevention of Vice and the Promotion
of Virtue.
She links up with an underground group, the Revolutionary Association
of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA). RAWA provide chilling, secret
footage of public executions of men and women at the main soccer
stadium in Kabul.
Shah asks the Taliban Foreign Minister if it's right that executions
are carried out in a place of entertainment funded by international
aid. The minister replies that the international community should
build a separate facility for executions.
RAWA takes Shah to a clandestine school for girls. It's run by
women teachers who have been banned from working by the Taliban.
"If they find out that we're running a course here, they
could hang us all," says one.
Shah visits a secret beauty salon where women seek a measure of
normality in a world gone mad. "This is a form of resistance,"
says one woman as she paints her nails. "We're defying the
Taliban."
Shah tours a gynaecological hospital where the desperate plight
of women can be clearly seen. The place is filthy, with few doctors
or medicines. More women die in childbirth in Afghanistan than
anywhere else, Shah reports.
She then heads to the front line of the civil war in north-east
Afghanistan. There she finds graphic evidence that the Taliban
have been torturing and massacring unarmed civilians.
This is a harrowing and depressing portrait of a country ruled
by terror. But Shah discovers slivers of hope among the poor and
the weak, as they battle on in a daily struggle against tyranny.
So the coalition gets support but, one way or another, then these
people have to be armed to do anything against their goverment.
That means those women painting their nails in definace carrying
guns. That means their kidos facing scud missiles. That still means
civilians dying. That still also means our hands are dirty because
someone has to give them something to stand up to these people.
Finger nail polish isn't going to drop 50,000 troops (if I have
the last count correct.)
2) Giving the people food or other services.
These people aren't currently living the way they are because it
hasn't been tried. If, again, I have my figures correct the United
States spends over $75 million a year in relief efforts. However,
nothing has changed.
While fighting Russia, bin Laden expended a vast amount of funds
on hospitals and schools. Now, he doesn't or more importantly the
Tilban doesn't. There is a reason for that. They needed the country's
backing or the populace because the US wasn't going to all out go
to War with Russia (Cold war nuke issue.) While I agree relief work
has a profound effect you have to be able to get there and, more
importantly, get it to the right place for it to work. Before now
that was something that wasn't really possible without inflaming
an bad situation to worse. (On a global scale.)
3) This is still usurping a governments power.
No matter which way you slice it hands are going to get dirty. Be
it a united UN force going in there or trying to get the populace
to rise up. Between the two, just like the jet hurtling towards
the school of 1000 children, I'd rather soliders got their hands
dirty then a 8 year old carrying a gun next to his mother.
Quote:
why was it necessary to cry out "war!"? there have been
terrorist attacks all over the world before this without the victimized
country declaring war.
Because many times, sadly, "we" (being more than just
the US) need a big one-sided excuse to actually go to where a huge
problem exists. The world in a gobal recession and resources are
not finte and "we" can only spread out so much or do so
much when causes are devided (particularlly within the UN.) For
example: Turkey could really go after many in the UN when they screamed
for terrorists to be turned over to them and several overseas went
on off on "humanity" and still harbor them. It isn't right
just like...
There is so much hunger in the world that we shouldn't ever HAVE
to encourage farmers not to farm. However the reality is someone
has to gross product pay for them to farm and to get the food over
there and for it to get to the right place. When so many countries
don't have money to begin with, we could easily, with everything
else, go completely bankrupt and then be able to help no one.
Luckly, Bush has one of the most competent, well picked staff in
the history of any President I have known in office while alive.
Whatever Bush is, like or dislike him, he's got the heavy guns of
intelligent, experinced, and level headed people on the job.
|
Kira
Scurro
Perch Pro
(9/17/01 12:45:54 pm)
|
Re: An Afghani-American perspective
and for that i am thankful, onnie. az, may i make a giant leap,
and say maybe part of the reason you are having a hard time with
all of this is because of your son being in the military. i would
think having someone so closely involved would make one want to
believe that his possible danger is for all the right reasons. i
could be wrong, but it's just a thought.
i wanted to mention something that i haven't seen noted anywhere.
i didn't know the details myself until i read the newspaper story
yesterday. there are 2 young american women, 24 and 29, at this
moment in an afghanistan jail. they are there for getting caught
redhanded showing a video of jesus in a muslim home. these women
were missionaries there to help the poverty stricken people in many
ways. up until tuesday almost everyone involved thought they would
probably get a brief jail sentence and be exported. now that all
western sympathizers, including these women's families, have fled
the country, no one believes these girls will ever get out alive.
this is just one story of the many affected by this crisis.
~BELIEVE~
|
AZLady
Frequently Perched
(9/17/01 5:15:47 pm)
|
RE:
An Afghani-American Perspective
Awful about those young aide workers, Kira. I had heard about it
briefly before but did not know the details. How much courage they
must have had in their faith, to go a country where even referring
to any God but Allah, much less believing in one or trying to share
your belief with others, means death.
I will add them to my prayers.
|
Torri
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 5:44:21 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
perspective
I heard the author of the original e-mail interviewed last night
on KABC 790. When he's not writing thought provoking e-mails, he's
the author of non-fiction children's books. His father is Afghani,
his mother is American. He was born and raised in Afghanistan but
has lived in the US for the past 36 years. He currently lives in
the San Francisco area.
He said that he originally sent this to about 20 friends. The radio
host who was interviewing him (Mr. KABC) said that he'd had no less
than 75 copies of the e-mail forwarded to him. One caller even stated
that the e-mail was reproduced in an Israeli newspaper.
The host & guest also discussed bin Laden. Bin Laden has quite
a few brothers and sisters living in the US...mostly in the Boston
area. The US based family members have donated millions of dollars
to Harvard University and deeply dislike their brother Osama. I'd
heard this information last week as well...I sometimes wonder if
this profound hatred of the US wasn't somehow born of something
more "personal" in bin Laden's background...that is, maybe
we're "the great Satan" for far more personal reasons
than any of us may have suspected. Just a thought.
|
Torri
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 5:55:35 am)
|
Re:
Feeding the people
Quote:
I am not an expert on conventional warfare but the Russian tried
using more air-to-ground fighting. Missiles don't go very far
down caves unless you're a real good shot. Ground-to-ground fighting
is the only way to get in to all the underground hiding places.
Nothing against the Russian people but I think our armed forces
are much better equipped, and they are going to have the people
behide them, plus we will have allies fighting with us.
My father and I were discussing this last night. He's retired but
spent his entire career working in the defense industry. He told
me that the main reason the Afghans were so successful in fighting
off the Soviets is because of the Stinger missiles the US provided.
The guidence system on a Stinger is virually impossible to out-maneuver
because the missile is accurate and fast. He also said that not
all of the Stingers we provided have been accounted for.
|
AZLady
Frequently Perched
(9/18/01 6:32:10 am)
|
An Afghani-American
Perspective
Wow, so now we're the victim of really bad sibling rivalry? Seriously,
most Arab-Americans probably still have family and close friends
in their homeland. I would hope they are on the phone or the e-mail
with anyone they still have in Arab countries urging them to help
us. I'm undoubtedly being overly optimistic here, but hope is all
I have left.
|
babzee
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 8:23:55 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Quote:
September 13, 2001 Talk about it E-mail story Print
COMMENTARY
Islam Must Challenge Its Dark Doctrines
By YOSSI KLEIN HALEVI,
In the emerging debate over how extensively to define the enemy
facing the West we need to avoid both wishful thinking and hysteria.
The minimalists who insist that the enemy is only a small band
of fanatics around Osama bin Laden severely underestimate the
penetration of extremist doctrine within much of mainstream Islam,
especially in the Arab world. But those who invoke a war of civilizations—a
conflict between Western democracy and international Islam—risk
widening the circle of enmity to large parts of the Islamic world
that have so far been immune to the appeal of jihad, or holy war.
Far from being regarded as fringe lunatics, the terrorists who
struck against U.S. civilian and military targets are widely regarded
as heroes within the Arab world. Religious edicts have been issued
in Arab countries endorsing the attack, and thousands danced in
the streets of the West Bank and Gaza. That pathological response
isn't just the result of anger at perceived injustice, but of
years of hate indoctrination in mosques and from state-controlled
media. Indeed, only in the Arab world is Holocaust denial a mainstream
notion.
Islamic doctrine easily lends itself to extremist cooptation.
Islam divides the world into two regions: Dar al Harb, or the
house of war, containing all territories ruled by non-Muslims,
and Dar al Islam, or the house of Islam, which is destined to
dominate the former. In a world groping toward planetary interconnectedness,
this Islamic doctrine—which justifies the madness of holy war—must
be challenged by Muslims themselves.
Humanistic Muslims need to face the lethal consequences of their
theology toward non-Muslims. Apologetics about the nobility of
Islam aren't good enough anymore. Just as much of Christianity
has confronted its anti-Jewish theology, and many Jews are struggling
to uproot the exclusivist strain within Judaism, tolerant Muslims
can no longer afford to defend Islam's more problematic concepts.
We are all heirs to complex religious traditions; the obligation
of believers is to preserve the beauty of their faith while transforming
its negative residues.
Those who try to shift the blame for the latest terrorist atrocities
on U.S. support for Israel miss several key points. The Arab war
against Israel isn't over occupation but the right of a Jewish
state to exist. Last year, at Camp David, former Prime Minister
Ehud Barak offered to withdraw from almost all the territories
and to share Jerusalem with the Palestinians—and the Temple Mount
with Islam.
More broadly, the terrorist's holy war isn't aimed ultimately
at Israel but the West. Muslim nations are among the the most
vociferous in ideologically opposing globalization—not just its
excesses but also its blessings, like a free media and a sense
of shared responsibility for international stability.
Indeed, perhaps Israel's greatest offense to Arab sensibilities
is its very Westerness, proof for many Muslims of its supposed
colonialist essence. Western standards of human rights—which Arab
propagandists routinely use to excoriate Israel—are almost unknown
within the Muslim world.
Still, it would be disastrous to declare Islam itself the enemy.
For many Muslims, the doctrines of holy war and of Dar al Islam
are irrelevant to their faith, and have in effect been allowed
to lapse. Sufis, or Muslim mystics, go further, transforming holy
war into a spiritual doctrine, a battle against one's own imperfections.
Demonizing one of the world's great faiths is an affront against
all religions.
The terrorists want nothing more than to widen this war to include
the whole Islamic world. And those in the Arab world—especially
Yasser Arafat—who actively nurture the culture of terrorism yet
pretend to condemn it hope to avoid the West's judgment. Neither
should be allowed to dictate the U.S. response to terrorism.
___
Yossi Klein Halevi's latest book is "At the Entrance to the
Garden of Eden: A Jew's Search for God with Christians and Muslims
in the Holy Land" (William Morrow, 2001).
For information about reprinting this article, go to www.lats.com/rights/register.htm
Strength and Honor
The enemy is fanaticism, extremism, intolerance, hate.
|
Lady Deirdre
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 8:34:20 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Please keep in mind while reading this: it was written by a Jew,
not a muslim. Which means, someone who knows islam from the outside,
second-hand.
Not to say that he is wrong in anything (who am I to say that
) but just be critical of what you read. For some of us that's a
natural stance, for others not so. Anything anyone says about religion
is inevitably interpretation, and we must always be aware of the
context the speaker brings with him/her.
I like this one btw:
Quote:
We are all heirs to complex religious traditions; the obligation
of believers is to preserve the beauty of their faith while transforming
its negative residues.
Communiaction: shut up and kiss me
Edited by: Lady Deirdre at: 9/18/01 8:39:41 am |
babzee
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 8:48:07 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Quote:
Please keep in mind while reading this: it was written by a Jew,
not a muslim.
Are you inferring that a Jew would naturally lie re Islam??????
Strength and Honor
The enemy is fanaticism, extremism, intolerance, hate.
|
Lady Deirdre
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 8:57:38 am)
|
Re:
An Afghani-American Perspective
I was afraid of this, but couldn't put it any other way.
What I meant was, that if you ask a Christian to describe Islam,
you get A, you ask a Jew to describe Islam, you get B and if you
ask a Muslim to describe Islam, you get C (not counting the A1,
A2,A3,A4 etc you will undoubtedly get). Everyone sees different
things and focussed on different things.
I was trying to avoid things like "I read about a muslim not
having a western view on human rights, so they have no respect for
life". Just trying to get people to think a little bit further
instead of jumping to conclusions. Just like the writer, who obviously
made an effort to be well-informed and balanced.
Communiaction: shut up and kiss me
|
babzee
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 9:03:20 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Quote:
Just trying to get people to think a little bit further instead
of jumping to conclusions.
So you just jumped to the conclusion that none of us was capable
or willing to think?
Thanks.
Strength and Honor
The enemy is fanaticism, extremism, intolerance, hate.
|
Lady Deirdre
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 9:05:22 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Quote:
So you just jumped to the conclusion that none of us was capable
or willing to think?
Thanks.
Oops! Okay, get your point now. Excuse me while I go wash off my
bit of arrogance...
But... is it okay if I don't poof-edit that remark? I hate it when
others do that and am reluctant to for this reason.
Communiaction: shut up and kiss me
|
sarony
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 10:27:13 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Ok, I wasn't going to even get into this, but I have a dear friend
who is Muslim. As I work with this wonderful godly man every day,
we've had many opportunities over the years to talk about our two
different religions, Islam and Christianity, and even more so during
the past week. The following quote from the afore metioned article
screamed out to me, for it is very true of many Muslims of today,
esp. my friend:
Quote:
For many Muslims, the doctrines of holy war and of Dar al Islam
are irrelevant to their faith, and have in effect been allowed
to lapse. Sufis, or Muslim mystics, go further, transforming holy
war into a spiritual doctrine, a battle against one's own imperfections.
Now I'm no expert on Islam, but I have been amazed at how similar
the teachings of Islam are to Christianity as my friend has discussed
these issues with me. They are very similar indeed.
He refuses to even consider bin Laden a Muslim. He sees little or
no teachings of true Islam in him. My friend's family still lives
in Damascus (all but his immediate, who are all now American citizens),
and he was high ranking military there at one time before coming
to America (without the government's permission, I might add) and
becoming an American citizen many years ago. This is a very learned
man, with several PhDs, and insists one of the main problems with
Muslim extremists is lack of education. For example, only 1/3 of
Afghans can read at all. The rest rely on their extremist militant
(and in his opinion ignorant) religious leaders for all information
pertaining to Islam and the rest of the world, as they often don't
have access to TV, radio, etc. They have no way of reading the Arabic
Koran text, to find out for themselves what the truth of Islam is.
Sadly, some of these religious leaders have twisted the faith of
Islam so radically that it doesn't resemble true Islam at all. These
people are often the blind leading the blind, willing to die for
the lies they have grown up believing and have been indoctrinated
in. Quite honestly, it's often all they have to hold on to, to give
them purpose in their life. They hide behind the idea of fighting
for God, but in actually lack the true knowledge of Allah to ever
be able to please Him as they so desperately want to do. Add in
the general culture of not enough food and necessities for living,
crazy regimes taking over and terrorizing and torturing their own
people, lack of education, being cut off from the rest of the world
in about every way, putting the blame for their lot on Western civilization,
and madmen masquerading as leaders, sometimes religious leaders
of those countries, and it's no wonder we're in this mess. The woes
of these cultures are so incredibly complex, there is no easy answer.
I'm rambling here, and I apologize. I have a million thoughts running
through my head, and they seem to propogate as I read this thread.
I will pass one thing my Muslim friend told me, much to my shock,
the day after this happened. He was very distraught over the events
of the 11th, so much so he left work for the rest of the day to
be with his family and go to mosque. He told me unfortunately these
kind of terrorists, esp. those from a part of the world he is all
too familiar with, don't usually respond to diplomatic/economic
processes. It's not a language they are fluent in. They understand
one thing, and if you want to get their attention, you have to speak
to them in their language sometimes. He almost started crying when
he spoke these words. I truly hope he is not right on this point.
May God help us all. Suffice it to say, this is going to get messy
I fear, regardless of the road the U.S. takes in this journey.
My ramblings are over. Thanks for having patience with me.
The world is heading for
mutiny / When all we want is unity / We may rise and fall, but
in the end / We meet our fate together / One / The only way
is one - "One", lyrics by Creed
|
babzee
Perch Pro
(9/18/01 10:37:17 am)
|
Re: An Afghani-American
Perspective
Sarony -- thanks so much for your 'ramblings'
Especially this
Quote:
They hide behind the idea of fighting for God, but in actually
lack the true knowledge of Allah to ever be able to please Him
as they so desperately want to do. Add in the general culture
of not enough food and necessities for living, crazy regimes taking
over and terrorizing and torturing their own people, lack of education,
being cut off from the rest of the world in about every way, putting
the blame for their lot on Western civilization, and madmen masquerading
as leaders, sometimes religious leaders of those countries, and
it's no wonder we're in this mess. The woes of these cultures
are so incredibly complex, there is no easy answer.
Edited to try to curb my resentment of people jumping to conclusions
about our inability to think.
Strength and Honor
The enemy is fanaticism, extremism, intolerance, hate.
Edited by: babzee
at: 9/18/01 10:40:39 am
|
|